I see, simply accept that most totalitarian of spiritual slaveries (religio, to bind, religion, bound, bonds-people, slaves), or simply commit one's whole capacity to act, the entirety of their reason, and the whole passion of their volition unto an eternally burning infernal sovereignty populated by all manner of diabolical persons hellishly bent of the capture, ravaging, rape, assassination, and annihilation of all egos.
It's not as though some of us haven't already had a hard choosing and gone down crooked roadways and made commitments of loyalty towards certain endings.
Luckily, not all of us have made our way in life in such manner as places certainty above wisdom, peacefulness over vitality, faith over and against all contradicting inspiration.
I dislike many labels that have been attached to my person over the years, usually because I quarrel with the definitions of certain titles. I have a question, though, to anyone with an answer...what womanish person of this world is so much like a "witchly" shade of otherwordly song and legend that she finds herself so self-possessed of so much a fiery and vengeful spirituality that she must either burn against a tree until she screaming dies or must instead throw fire and vengeance against the civilization that she was originally most alienated from?
How many so woman-ish, self-possessed persons do you think live in this world, in your own country, amongst your own neighbors? It wouldn't take many, and never has, to cause quite a bit of ungodly ghastly troubles for others. I would hope that we all strive to some form of euthanasia, whether our dying be in peace or I deaths be violent or the purposes of our actions valorous.
It's rarely a diversion to have to make one's own decisions, but almost never are our choices actually "black vs. white, Satan vs. the Divinities, goodness vs. suffering/sufferance".
I can't deny a bit of admiration for practical Muslims and Muslimahs (those that are most practiced, more perfected) into the disciplines of their own choosing. I could also have some sense of appreciation for the austerity of their specific type of extreme-fidelity-unto-imagined-Ideal-towards-higher-works-of-greater-godliness. In fact, amongst all the types of Mono-theisms there is definitely one that always come across to me as much more the "temptress" and least the "adversary" among alien and hated banners, at least for me. That is most embodied in some of what I find the very peculiar pieties and iconic religiosity of Islam. Of the peculiar pieties, head-covering and embodied prayerfulness (all that kneeling and standing among many of the masses) and occassionally esctatic whirling type of dance-like, tranced though artful type of performance best embodied by the "Dervish" who are at least in some part devoted unto the study and deeper understandings of certain scriptural texts and peculiar spiritual ideations outside the Q'uran itself.
At other times, I marveled both at the concept of a Supreme Unitive Godhead so utterly authoritative that it passed a ban on every possible conceivable type of idolatry or 'devotion unto earthly images of carnal bestial forms nor of heavenly ghostings and ghastly spirits'... and most DEFINITELY not rivalling imagined Deities that presumed to be a similar type but after a different mannerism as "ALLAH"
That has been a curse upon those kingdoms that have come under thrall of that peculiar idea of supreme and singular unity of the concepts of "law" and "divinity" which could only look so much like a "God-the-Father-of-all-Fuckups-unto-all-Fatality" as say, "Bible-God."
And then there's the Q'uran, of course, the received mouthings of some particular personage that has found the authority to by some means declare the words that escepe their mouths "THE very true most specified words of THAT deity which is ALL Divinity"...that's where some boundaries must absolutely be drawn and others brutally transgressed. Some reasonable boundaries are obviously apparent by virtue of their good reasoning, inherent integrity, honorable activity, greater wisdom and/or wiser ways of connecting with the world around us and strangest of very self-ish core that I would best prefer to describe as the instinctual "heart" of the natural human species. We are undeniably the species on Earth most inclined to the greatest capacities of intellection and imagination that the planet has, according to all knowledge available to us ever produced.
And one thing that I simply cannot help but wonder, as I can't begin to understand how anyone could not, if they have come to an understanding of the historicity behind the text and the histories attached to it, this one thing.
Why is it remotely important if the God is a "real type of the only possible type of real deity"?
Isn't it infinitely more interesting, terrible, fruitful, yielding deeper comtempletive understandings and greater heights mindfulness to begin asking more reasonable questions about the texts with quite possibly very fascinating answers? How the fuck was it actually "received..." It is important, quite important to remember that it is very efficacious in just about all aspects for just this type of prophet to be a smart-allecky illiterate. All "Prophets" are pretty much punks and smart-allecks that have made very specific sorts of annunciation under only impossible to believe endlessly impassible unto Reason types of circumstances and they have a hidden counterpart that is very 'shadowy' in personage but makes, for all intents and purpose, every god-damned difference that could ever matter. What is the strange relationship of the hidden scribe to invocatory or divinely intoxicated person? The prophet-type is most usually illiterate, socially transgressive, possessed of some inaccessible stream of weird and babbling words as could only be dazzling to have heard performanced and enticing to enshrine somehow, the words of the prophet after death. Do notice some striking similarties, in the epics attributed to gods of wisdom and the biographical epics of certain prophets. They tend to get assassinated or made eternally captive unto death before "everyone realizes" they were "the rightest all the time"...
The scribing-typistry and dextrous artistries of Script that belong to the scribes of gods and their epics make literally ALL the difference, here. Though held in high regard among the faithful, perhaps for the sake of it, is a person who bears almost no criticism, and is afforded the assumption of saintly mantles after death, quite often. Now that's an inter-textuality of almost sexual intimacy and most tantalizing intimation. One worth the pain of getting to the bottom of the obscure pathway that most connects the visible insanity of the "annunciations" to the heartfelt mournful strains of the "worshipful." Just what the fuck is going on about that?
I can't answer questions like those with any ease, certainly, or with reliance on merely rationality and historicity. Some otherly machinations seem to connect those worshipful mourning, the most obscure scribes of all-occulted raving, and very strange and later dubbed (much later than scribes often begin the scribbling) are indentified as "Perfections of Virtue," "Redeemers unto Greatest Wisdom", or, more mystically speaking, "Perfect Hearts." So oft-despised in their lifetime and so late-unto-their-own-greatness, it is easy to imagine that these people are somehow "doing the timing thing differently" of have some special access to some "it" of which the rest of us are simply incapable of bringing into our own awareness. Reasons are plentiful not to try to do anything like that at all, ever...in fact they are bountiful...and yet enough people find it so hard to either stay away from one thing and must always bow and bend towards another thing and yet neither of things present in anywise a middling way between their polarized extremes. So-called "sacred literature" appears to present the qualities and properties of that "Heart-ness" of those mysterious "Hearts" who perfected the vitality in them that it became the Magnum Opus of some Fellows and a Great Work/Great Apology and Righteous Sufferance unto their familial and soulful Hierarchies, the Cults. Let us consider a "Cultus" an organized body of those particular souls that have made Contract unto some Covenant. Souls of faithful persons too weak to have found a path through their own hearts without somehow making bargain and exchanges for the "SOUL" that was within their hearted-ness. Maybe that's how they did it the whole time. They never sold anything in the first place in expectation toward stupid ends, but held unto something that eventually burst forth unto endless streams of tearfullness and endless wells of bloodiness.
No comments:
Post a Comment